Alcoholism, drug addiction and smoking treatment according to Dovzhenko method. Expert's opinion.*
* All the materials were published in "BULLETIN of Hypnology and Psychotherapy"
The method of drug addiction and alcoholism treatment | Experts'
opinion | Conversations
with the doctor | Useful links |
Feedback
RELAPSE CHARACTERISTICS
AND OUTCOME PROGNOSIS IN THE TREATMENT OF ALCOHOLIC PATIENTS BY
THE DOVZHENKO METHOD
I. Ts. Epshtein, 0. I. Epshtein
Chronic alcoholism as an illness
demonstrates a tendency to repeated relapses, which not
infrequently leads to pessimism in the physician's evaluation of
this heavy affliction.
Various authors report various treatment effectiveness, ranging
from 20-to 30% within the first year of treatment. The figures
are given both for general medical clinics and the LTP
(penal-servitude medical institutions). We believe that the
results for the latter arc overstated.
Several authors have reported considerably successful outcome in
the treatment of alcoholism. Thus, in the Maritime and Khabarovsk
Territories, V. S. Grebennikov applied halfstationary treatment
in alcoholic patients, combined with the A. S. Makarenko
personality overtraining techniques, demonstrating fairly good
outcome. The methods, however, are labour-consuming and could
only be applied to small numbers of patients and under certain
territorial and demographic conditions.
The method of treating alcoholism suggested by A. R. Dovzhenko
ensures both superior effectiveness and application in any
conditions, besides having a large "capacity". All
physicians using the method emphasize excellent outcome of the
treatment, which makes the task of investigating relapse under
this method all the more important. The available literature has
not been known to discuss the matter to date.
The present paper bases on a relapse investigation in the
patients treated by the A. R. Dovzhenko method in the
Nizhnevartovsk self-supporting addiction treatment station in
1987-1990, and a comparison study of the abovementioned group and
the total amount of patients treated for alcoholism by: this
method.
In 1987-1990 we treated 4695 alcoholic patients in our station.
Information has been available on 1730 patients, comprising 35.5%
of the total amount treated. 353 of them relapsed, which
comprises 20.6% of the total available information or 7.5% of the
total amount treated. Besides, it should be emphasized that it is
usually of relapses that we can receive information, so actual
relapse percentage is somewhat between 20.4% and 7.5%, closer to
15%.
Of the relapses, in up to 3-month remissions were 79 patients
(22.4%); for 3 to 6 months-102 (28.9%), for 6 months to 1 year-96
(27.2%); over a year-76 (21.5%).
"Decoded" before the relapse (i. e. refused further
treatment) were 103 patients (28.1%) of total relapse;
"decoded" after the relapse- 152 (41.3%); with only 98
patients (31.6%) not decoded for some reason; which once again
indicates that the patients believe in the treatment. Besides, in
order to be "decoded", the patients came from distant
parts of the large Tiumen' Region and other parts of the Union.
The table given below compares several characteristics of the
patients who relapsed with the total amount treated.
Total amount treated in 1987-1990 | Relapsed in 1987-1990 | |||
Abs. fig. | in % | Abs.fig. | in % | |
Total amount of alcoholic patients treated | 4,695 | 100% | 353 | 100% |
incl. women | 570 | 12.1% | 21 | 5.9% |
Of total amount rural | 347 | 7.2% | 11 | 3.2% |
age groups: | ||||
up to 25 | 231 | 4.8% | 32 | 9.2% |
26-30 | 938 | 19.6% | 74 | 21.2% |
31-40 | 2.413 | 51.4% | 181 | 51.7% |
41-50 | 906 | 19.2% | 54 | 15.4% |
over 60 | 11 | 0.3% | --- | --- |
Medical advice taken | ||||
primary | 2.060 | 43.9% | 161 | 46.8% |
secondary | 2.635 | 56.1% | 212 | 53.2% |
Place of residence | ||||
a).Nizhnevatovsk | 1.162 | 22.0% | 160 | 41.1% |
b).Tiumen' Region | 3.260 | 69.9% | 178 | 54.7% |
c).Other parts | 217 | 8.1% | 15 | 4.2% |
Social positions: | ||||
workers | 3.581 | 76.2% | 268 | 76.5% |
collective farmers | 56 | 1.2% | 5 | 1.5% |
office workers | 663 | 13.6% | 43 | 12.3% |
retired | 55 | 1.2% | 2 | 0.7% |
non-working | 220 | 4.8% | 35 | 10% |
Marital status | ||||
marreid | 3.689 | 78.5% | 260 | 74.2% |
single | 376 | 8.0% | 43 | 12.2% |
divorced | 620 | 13.5% | 50 | 13.6% |
Education | ||||
primary | 80 | 1.6% | 3 | 0.9% |
secondary not completed | 953 | 20.2% | 53 | 25.1% |
secondary | 3.334 | 70.9% | 256 | 73.9% |
higher | 418 | 7.3% | 41 | 10.1% |
Alcoholism stage: | ||||
voluntary heavy drinking | 6 | 0.2% | 2 | 0.6% |
1 - stage | 215 | 4.8% | 19 | 5.4% |
1 - 2 stage | 382 | 8.2% | 40 | 10.1% |
2 - stage | 3.495 | 74.5% | 294 | 70.0% |
2 - 3 stage | 429 | 9.2% | 31 | 8.8% |
3 - stage | 161 | 3.1% | 18 | 5.1% |
Illness duration | ||||
up to 5 years | 1.447 | 37.9% | 132 | 37.6% |
6 - 10 years | 1.888 | 40.4% | 132 | 37.6% |
11 - 15 years | 388 | 8.4% | 51 | 14.5% |
16 - 20 years | 426 | 9.4% | 27 | 7.7% |
over 20 years | 136 | 2.9% | 11 | 3.1% |
Alcoholic psychoses in case history | 188 | 4.0% | 31 | 8.8% |
Insufficient critical appraisal | 3.919 | 83.3% | 261 | 70.4% |
Abstinence duration before the session - 2w. | 539 | 11.4% | 78 | 22.2% |
3 - 4 weeks | 3.170 | 67.0% | 130 | 37.1% |
1 - 2 months | 616 | 13.1% | 91 | 26.9% |
over 2 months | 370 | 8.5% | 54 | 13.8% |
Alcoholic inheritance | 2.343 | 49.1% | 182 | 51.7% |
Alcohol-consumption forms: | ||||
pseudo-alcohol abuse | 3.699 | 79.1% | 288 | 80.2% |
permanent, low-tolerant | 269 | 5.9% | 6 | 1.1% |
permanent, high-tolerant | 413 | 9.0% | 24 | 6.8% |
sporadic heavy drinking | 305 | 8.0% | 35 | 11.8% |
Personality change: | ||||
absent | 2.193 | 46.6% | 197 | 56.2% |
Sharpened personality | ||||
traits | 1.939 | 41.6% | 136 | 38.8% |
Degradation | 512 | 11.8% | 24 | 5.8% |
Encoding terms: | ||||
1 year | 199 | 4.9% | 9 | 2.6% |
2 - 3 years | 710 | 15.1% | 50 | 14.8% |
4 - 5 years | 1.301 | 27.7% | 119 | 33.8% |
6 - 10 years | 1.270 | 25.4% | 68 | 19.3% |
11 - 15 years | 185 | 3.9% | 15 | 4.2% |
16 - 20 years | 147 | 3.1% | 11 | 2.7% |
21 - 30 years | 34 | 0.8% | 11 | 2.7% |
for the rest of one's life | 851 | 18.1% | 70 | 19.9% |
From the analysis of the table several
conclusions can be drawn. Thus, interestingly, women treated by
the A. R. Dovzhenko method have been observed to relapse less
frequently than men. The problem of alcoholism in women is very
important, all authors admitting treatment outcome in women worse
than in men. With the use of the A. R. Dovzhenko method, the
relationship is conversed, which will undoubtedly contribute to
the solution of female alcoholism problem.
One is struck by the highest percentage of relapse in younger
patients (up to the age of 25). Younger people obviously require
more consistent outpatient treatment; they should not be
"hustled" to the A. R. Dovzhenko method. The most
successful in the treatment is the older age group (over 40).
There arc no significant differences between the treatment
outcome in primary and secondary patients, with the effectiveness
slightly higher in the secondary group, which can be explained by
a larger amount of ol-der patients therein.
It is interesting to note that relapse in Nizhnevartovsk
residents is almost 2 times higher than in the residents of other
towns and regions. This may be related to the fact that treatment
is easily available for the former, so that even accidental
patients not aiming at being treated can be admitted.
The patients' social position had no practical relation to
outcome, but non-working patients relapsed two times more
frequently than the work-ing ones. Similarly, single patients
relapsed almost 1.5 times more often. The outcome is slightly
better in office workers compared to other so-cial groups, but
here one should remark those patients with higher educa-tion
relapse more often than less educated patients.
There are some interesting data on the relationship between
treatment outcome and illness stage. Higher stages have been
believed to demon-strate better outcome. Our investigation,
however, shows outcome in lo-wer stages worse than in higher
ones, except in the third stage accompa-nied by defined
degradation, where outcome is naturally worse. Patients with
alcoholic psychoses in case history relapse 2 times more often
than the others.
While the patient's critical appraisal of his illness is
admittedly subjective, patients with low critical appraisal
exhibit worse treatment outcome than those whose critical
appraisal is sufficiently high. Slightly better outcome was shown
in patients with no alcoholic inheritance com-pared to the
reverse.
In compliance with the leading physician's demand, we had to
admit a number of narcology department inmates (altogether 98
patients). It should be noted, however, that treatment outcome
there was worse than in the main group. Besides, it discriminates
indoor patients. We there-fore believe that the A. R. Dovzhenko
method is not advisable for inpatient treatment.
An interesting relationship was demonstrated between treatment
out-come and pro-treatment "abstinence duration". The
best outcome was de-monstrated with the 3-4 week period. The
2-week period and, strange as it may seem, the 1-2 month and more
"abstinence duration" were the worst. Also significant
is the patients' selection of "abstinence duration".
With longer encoding terms (over 10 years and "for the rest
of one's life") outcome is worse than with shorter terms.
The best encoding outcome was observed with 1-year terms.
Obviously, "long" encoding terms sho-uld not be
advised. Similarly, there is need to discuss the advisability of
recommending adequate encoding terms for each individual patient.
Our attention was drawn by the fact that treatment outcome in
per-manent alcohol-abusers (both high- and low-tolerant) was
better than in pseudo-alcohol abusers and those practicing
sporadic heavy drinking.
With sharpened personality traits and, paradoxically,
degradation, outcome is better than when heavy changes are not
observed.
Highly important, as we believe, are investigation results on the
A. R. Dovzhenko treatment outcome in the original population of
the North. The problem of alcoholism is known to be one of
survival for these people, helpless against the vices of
civilization. We treated 95 patients belonging to the aboriginal
population of the North (the Khanty, the Mansi, the Nenets) and
observed only one relapse. Not less important is that the A. R.
Dovzhenko single treatment method is absolutely indi-spensable
for the people, living far apart on the boundless tundra, where
even a doctor's assistant's station is hundreds kilometers away,
to say nothing of a narcological dispensary.
Our investigations permit certain conclusions on possible
applications of the A. R. Dovzhenko method in each specific
patient category and, to a certain extent, a prognosis on the
treatment outcome.
SOME
CLINICAL ASPECTS OF
THE DOVZHENKO METHOD
V. F. Zverev (Petersburg)
Extraordinary response to the
Dovzhenko method of treating alcoholic patients-89-93% positive
response (in various sections)- can be explained by a complex of
therapeutic factors involved. Dominating among them is the
emotional and aesthetic effect on the patient, his emotional
memory mechanisms fixating the injunctions to sobriety, blocking
the alcoholic, dynamic stereotype and breaking psychological
alcohol dependence.
Pathogenetic mechanisms of the effect not yet fully investigated
seem to be polyfactorial. We believe that not the least important
among them are the clinical principles of patient selection based
on comprehensive evaluation of their condition: personality
traits, dynamics and actual syndromologic manifestations of
alcohol illness, evidence of somatic or psychosomatic
pathologies, neurotic disorders.
Our clinical observations (740 alcoholic patients over one year)
have shown that, along with positive treatment motivation, of
great importance for successful treatment outcome are the
patient's personality traits on the one hand, and on the other -
alcohol disorder psychopathologic structure and disturbances of
psychosomatic origin.
The most impressive and stable therapeutic outcome has been
observed in patients with paranoiac-epileptoid and psychastenic
characteristics which, rather curiously, are polar versions and
psychopathies in clinico-psychological structure. It should be
emphasized that the patients had a stable positive motivation for
treatment and sobriety but, as a whole, the phenomenon is worth
investigating.
Stable outcomes without any particular relation to personality
traits have been observed in patients with the alcohol, syndrome
structure dominated by psychic radical, and particularly - with a
depression-anxiety-phobia component in evidence.
Stable positive response to the Dovzhenko treatment of alcoholism
has also been observed with pathologies of psychosomatic origin,
in particular with manifestations of somatized depression,
cardialgias and abdominal algias with phobic inclusions,
cancerophobias, symptoms of ischemia without actual changes in
coronary vessels, evidence of hypothalamic syndrome.
Among the 7-8% of the patients not cured are primarily those with
a marked conforming accentuation, where deficient will and
susceptibility to the influence of drinking companies led to
drinking relapses in the absence of alcohol addiction, "for
company only". The same group (with high percentage of
failures) contains patients with excitable and unstable forms of
psychopathies and accentuations, as well as mental defects on a
level of mental deficiency or mild debility.
The group also includes patients with defined depressive and
neurotic disorders, compulsive alcohol addiction and actual
alcohol abuse conditions in the case history.
All these patients (not treated successfully) require special
psychotherapeutical and psychopharmacological support before and
after the Dovzhenko stress-therapy, if it is thought advisable
despite counterindications.
The clinical findings, therefore, provide certain orientation for
patient selection, adequate preparation for treatment, if
necessary, as well as prognosis and follow-up.
EXPERIENCE IN THE DOVZHENKO STRESS-THERAPY FOR ALCOHOLIC
PATIENTS WITH ALCOHOLIC EPILEPSY COMPLICATIONS, CRANIOCEREBRAL
INJURIES, AND THE BLIND.
A. I. Drozdov (Pskov)
The abovementioned groups of patients require
strictly individualized selection standards (involving a
comprehensive clinical condition evaluation) and a measured
emotion-stress treatment for alcohol illness.
To avoid overdosing and negative effects, a session of
emotion-stress therapy, while retaining the continuity of the
treatment process, is divided into separate fragments, stages
(cascades), which permits the psychiatrist to arrest the increase
in treatment intensity at each specific stage immediately after a
required therapeutic effect is attained, that is - to measure the
loads in emotion-stress therapy.
Doses in this cascade, stage encoding were "measured"
primarily with respect to the patient's vegetovascular reactions,
making their quick-test diagnosis.
Special care must be taken in encoding patients with alcoholic
epilepsy where there is actual danger of a major spasm within
encoding or soon after. A certain amount of risk might be
pardoned, but only when all other indications for the treatment
of the primary disease - chronic alcoholism-by the Dovzhenko
method are indisputable.
The essence of encoding in such patients was to find a, so to
say, theoretical load-level where emotion-stress treatment would
be both therapeutically effective and mild, if possible. This
requires a long experience in psychotherapy, maximum of
individualized approach to each patient, optimal psychological
contact with the patient established in a short time and an
ability to perform immediate release of excessive emotional and
vegetative reactions.
In encoding the blind emphasis is made on acupuncture, verbal
influence and specifically dosed loads on the patient's
vestibular apparatus. The cascade-treatment principle is also
applied here.
Our experience indicates that in encoding patients with
craniocerebral injuries a psychotherapy session should be
terminated with balancing the patient's psyche, relieving his
psychic tension and vegetovascular reactions, for which purpose
verbal suggestions can be accompanied by soft strokes on the
patient's head and neck, or magnetic field influence (magnetors).
Catamnestic data over a year indicate that in the stage-version
encoding with strictly individualized loads for each of the three
patient groups discussed here response to the Dovzhenko
stress-therapy is sufficiently high (85% positive response).
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGICAL
THERAPY IN THE SYSTEM
OF TREATMENT OF ALCOHOLIC PATIENTS BY THE DOVZHENKO METHOD
Ì. Ì. Zikevskaia (Petersburg)
Chronic alcoholic patients examination and
selection for treatment by the Dovzhenko stress-psychotherapy
method (SPT) not infrequently revealed patients requiring
treatment with pharmacologic means (in prescribing them, however,
consideration was given to the fact that the Dovzhenko method
depends on abstention from medications for 15-20 days before a
session).
We examined 182 patients to whom psychotropic means were
administered in individualized combinations and doses. In respect
to personality traits and psychoneurotic disorder structure the
patients could be divided in three groups:
1) patients with borderline psychoneurotic
disorders-psychopathies, neuroses, defined character
accentuations but without evidence of with-drawal by the start of
examination - (102).
2) patients in mild but prolonged withdrawal conditions dominated
by seemingly neurotic disorders with persistent obsessive alcohol
addiction (47).
3) patients with marked withdrawal syndromes, physical and
psychic discomfort evidence, vegetovascular disorders, steady
alcohol addiction to an over-important level, sometimes
compulsive (33).
Because of their specific condition, in particular of defined
psycho-neurotic instability, all the patients had relative
counterindications to the Dovzhenko method and in this respect
could be considered risk group.
Psychopharmacological therapy for Group 1 patients was conducted
preparatory to the SPT because of the advisability of releasing
manifestations of emotional lability and tension, providing a
steady background, normalizing sleep and appetite, compensating
general psycho-neurotic condition.
Treatment in Group 2 depended on the need to arrest withdrawal
manifestations, resolve seemingly neurotic symptomatology, reduce
alcohol addiction. The objects were to attain maximum
self-awareness and capacity for critical appraisal of the
situation, to observe the regime of abstinence.
Psychopharmacological therapy in Group 3 seems necessary since
out-patients in this Group would be unable to observe the
required regime of abstinence without special pharmaceutical
support.
Psychopharmacological therapy in all three groups was accompanied
by rational psychotherapy and detoxification. In Groups 1 and 2
attention was at the time focused on rational psychotherapy,
particularly in Group 1. Dominating in Group 3, together with
psychopharmacological therapy, were detoxification measures.
Group 1 patients after the SPT course were, if indicated, offered
counseling, administration of psychotropic means was resumed in
small doses and short courses-up to two weeks. Similar support
was given to Group 2 patients with persistent seemingly neurotic
symptomatology. Courses there lasted up to 3-4 weeks.
We examined one more group (Group 4) of patients with disorders
similar to those in Groups 1-3, but for some reasons not
subjected to adequate Psychopharmacological therapy preparatory
to the SPT.
The findings of one-year observations in Groups 1-3 as compared
to Group 4, assumed as control group, indicated that treatment of
alcoholic patients with psychotropic means preparatory to the SPT
could increase therapeutic effectiveness by 9-12% (in various
patient sections). Thus among patients subjected to the required
psychopharmacological therapy 7-9% were decoded within a year
after, while in control group the amount was 18-20%.
The findings suggest that for alcoholic patients with the
background of pathologic personality traits or accompanying
neurotic disorders, or acute character accentuations (risk group)
referred for the Dovzhenko therapy psychopharmacological
correction of psychosomatic condition and personality disorders
is advisable. This correction is necessary for patients with
defined withdrawal syndrome and compulsive alcohol addiction.
It should also be noted that examination and selection of
patients for the SPT reveal patients with psychotic disturbances
(paranoid states of schizophrenic origin, chronic alcoholic
hallucinoses with tendency for delusions etc.). Such patients
were not treated by the Dovzhenko method because of their
deficient or absent critical appraisal of the disease and the
danger of recurring delirious experiences. They were recommended
psychotropic means (antopsychotics, antidepressants-sedatives,
correctors) and observation in psychoneurologic dispensaries, and
their relatives received relevant instructions.
In conclusion it should be emphasized that success in preparatory
psychopharmacological therapy depends not on affecting the
patient's alcohol addiction, but rather on strengthening his
psychological resistance to emotional stresses.
The method of drug addiction and alcoholism treatment | Experts'
opinion | Conversations
with the doctor | Useful links |
Feedback
Copyright © 1999; Marina A.Ryabtsun. All Rights Reserved. Last checked: 23.09.99